 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
Building Social Insurance in Rimavska Sobota is good, standard, public buildings.
Long-distance running
New Social Insurance in Rimavska Sobota is an object of the typical genesis of its inception:
- Trade competition to select the contractor of the project was launched in 2003. Was evaluated in 2004.
- Followed by a break due to technical problems associated with the exchange of land.
- Space for project development was then determined for the period May to December 2005 had to be made when complete documentation for the construction of buildings, including the interior. In December 2005, the dossier was also handed over.
- Then nothing happened until 2008, when the building contractor selection took place.
- Building began in late 2008.
- Building section was completed in 2010.
- In 2011, to complete your interior decorating and building interiors. At the end of the building began to work and fulfill their purpose.
- Trade competition to select the contractor of the project was launched in 2003. Was evaluated in 2004.
- Followed by a break due to technical problems associated with the exchange of land.
- Space for project development was then determined for the period May to December 2005 had to be made when complete documentation for the construction of buildings, including the interior. In December 2005, the dossier was also handed over.
- Then nothing happened until 2008, when the building contractor selection took place.
- Building began in late 2008.
- Building section was completed in 2010.
- In 2011, to complete your interior decorating and building interiors. At the end of the building began to work and fulfill their purpose.
Characteristic are two facts of this Tender. Time and space for the design project is a fraction of the entire process of building.
At the same time selecting the contractor building the project design
and ongoing commercial bids, "project work", where the basic criterion
is the offered price of the project.
Let's see how it went. The big surprise, I can say that is not bad. Building Social Insurance in Rimavska Sobota is good, standard, public buildings. The materials and means of expression is appropriate, sparingly.
I appreciate a good deal of emphasis on the operation of creating
appropriate conditions for clients, transparency, security and strict
separation of functional areas. On the ground floor place the vast majority of activities related to public relations. There is also a dining room for employees.
The central location of the checkpoint (informant, security), which is
used strategically to monitor movement throughout the building. Higher floors are purely administrative. In the basement there is a technical and sanitary facilities building.
The building is in the context of urban development rather than the context-continued solitary surroundings. Wine, however, by building in more heterogeneous structure of outstanding street.
The building responds more to a measure of apartment buildings across
the street on the southeast side than the other immediate neighbors
(architectural quality which is more than problematic).
A simple rectangular masses and recognized materials in moderate
monochrome gray-white color - white plaster, glass, metal in raw form
(Titanium Zinc sheet roofing, galvanized metal other elements) are a
good choice for serious public building.
Time brought a change in the requirements for the structure of the Social Insurance offices. There was a reduction in some departments, others arose. Some areas are offered to external users. With rational simple concept has potential but building to respond to these changes in time and absorb them.
Public funds were spent inappropriate. The building serves well. Despite the way the contract is not quite adequate space allocated for the proposal. How is this possible? There would need to be pointed out that the greatest merit of the architect. A contract was given into the hands of Spring Janek, who through their previous experience could do a good job. Quantification did not adapt to the mechanical conditions of the procurement process, but did a professional performance. But the second time it does not come out like typing. The company certainly is not the best solution for trading competition for the project with the lowest price. For the cheapest building project does not provide the best, rather the opposite.
It is important in the genesis of one building. We will play our next long-distance running (if we want to ensure that the optimum outcome total). An important principle is to award public contracts. The resulting quality of the work shall be determined in the draft - the architectural concept, the quality of the preparatory phase project. If this phase is neglected, the result will not save anything. Here is determined not only quality but also price and overall economics and efficiency results. Work must work well not only be economic in investment costs, but also running a non-negligible are also cultural aspects of the superstructure, which should satisfy. Only if we convince the joint efforts of all those contracts provide that the underestimation of the project design phase and construction is the worst thing for a good result can do, today we have a chance to make the routine selection of the cheapest projects. It will not be easy or short journey. Legislative nothing to prevent us. Despite a general awareness of the Public Procurement Office is not opposed. The design competition is at least equivalent to legal tender way over the lowest bid. Just need to impose on public authorities.
Social Insurance in Rimavska Sobota is an example of an exception that proves the rule. Personal contribution and professionalism of the work of the architect created a work filled with honor to his purpose. If it was not the personal investment, procurement system would fail. Can not rely on such a happy coincidence. If you want a superior standard solutions, has competition in processor design has primarily reflect the quality of the tenders and not at the lowest cost project (others would be most effective and most economical solution and the resulting works of longer term). The cheapest proposal generally prevents the best and most economical implementation.
It is important in the genesis of one building. We will play our next long-distance running (if we want to ensure that the optimum outcome total). An important principle is to award public contracts. The resulting quality of the work shall be determined in the draft - the architectural concept, the quality of the preparatory phase project. If this phase is neglected, the result will not save anything. Here is determined not only quality but also price and overall economics and efficiency results. Work must work well not only be economic in investment costs, but also running a non-negligible are also cultural aspects of the superstructure, which should satisfy. Only if we convince the joint efforts of all those contracts provide that the underestimation of the project design phase and construction is the worst thing for a good result can do, today we have a chance to make the routine selection of the cheapest projects. It will not be easy or short journey. Legislative nothing to prevent us. Despite a general awareness of the Public Procurement Office is not opposed. The design competition is at least equivalent to legal tender way over the lowest bid. Just need to impose on public authorities.
Social Insurance in Rimavska Sobota is an example of an exception that proves the rule. Personal contribution and professionalism of the work of the architect created a work filled with honor to his purpose. If it was not the personal investment, procurement system would fail. Can not rely on such a happy coincidence. If you want a superior standard solutions, has competition in processor design has primarily reflect the quality of the tenders and not at the lowest cost project (others would be most effective and most economical solution and the resulting works of longer term). The cheapest proposal generally prevents the best and most economical implementation.
| name | Social Insurance - Branch Rimavská Saturday |
| where | Mikszáth street - street Škultétyho, Rimavská Saturday |
| author | Trijati / design studio - Jaroslav Janek |
| investor | Social Insurance Bratislava |
| project | 05th 2005 - 12 2005 |
| realization | 12th 2008 - 11 2010 (Interior 2011) |
| costs | 3,452,167, - € |
| photo | Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
 |
| Jaroslav Janek - Social Insurance Rimavská Saturday - photo © Branislav Hovorka, John Freshwater |
0Comment:
Post a Comment